<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
   <title>The REAL McCain</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://therealmccain.com/" />
   <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://therealmccain.com/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:therealmccain.com,2007://26</id>
   <updated>2007-06-10T13:31:32Z</updated>
   
   <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 3.33</generator>

<entry>
   <title>Press Still Fawns Over McCain</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://therealmccain.com/2007/06/press_still_fawns_over_mccain.php" />
   <id>tag:therealmccain.com,2007://26.6131</id>
   
   <published>2007-06-10T13:21:56Z</published>
   <updated>2007-06-10T13:31:32Z</updated>
   
   <summary>From Media Matters: During the &quot;All-Star Panel&quot; segment on the June 6 edition of Fox News Special Report with Brit Hume, Roll Call executive editor Morton Kondracke asserted that during the GOP presidential debates, Sen. John McCain &quot;was the truth-teller...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Cliff Schecter</name>
      <uri>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/cliff-schecter/</uri>
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://therealmccain.com/">
      <![CDATA[<a href="http://mediamatters.org/items/200706070011?src=other">From Media Matters:</a>

<blockquote>During the "All-Star Panel" segment on the June 6 edition of Fox News Special Report with Brit Hume, Roll Call executive editor Morton Kondracke asserted that during the GOP presidential debates, Sen. John McCain "was the truth-teller about the war in Iraq." Yet during the debates, McCain stated more than once that "they" -- Al Qaeda or other terrorists --"will follow us home" if the United States withdraws from Iraq, an assertion that is widely challenged by security and terrorism experts.</blockquote>]]>
      <![CDATA[<blockquote>Outside the debates, McCain recently claimed that Americans "could walk through" some neighborhoods in Baghdad, to which CNN and Time magazine Baghdad correspondents responded, respectively, that the claim that "an American can walk freely [in Baghdad] is beyond ludicrous" and that McCain "needs a reality check."</blockquote>

Is Morto just mixed up because he spends more of his time at the pigs-in-a-blanket circuit in DC than ever talking to a real person? Yes. But Gloria Borger, Joe Klein and many other members of the press, from whom we expect to get unbiased information about our leaders, have said the same thing ad nauseam.

Make sure to get your shots this summer. The new strain of Potomac Fever out there seems to particularly degrade short-term memory and having more common sense than a horse's ass.]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Remember: Bush, McCain and Lieberman Support The Troops</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://therealmccain.com/2007/05/remember_bush_mccain_and_liebe.php" />
   <id>tag:therealmccain.com,2007://26.6115</id>
   
   <published>2007-05-28T05:33:57Z</published>
   <updated>2007-05-28T05:35:35Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Can&apos;t you tell? (h/t Matt Ortega):...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Cliff Schecter</name>
      <uri>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/cliff-schecter/</uri>
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://therealmccain.com/">
      <![CDATA[<a href="http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/05/27/news/delta.php?page=1 ">Can't you tell?</a> (h/t Matt Ortega):

]]>
      <![CDATA[<blockquote>"In 2003, 2004, 100 percent of the soldiers wanted to be here, to fight this war," said Sergeant First Class David Moore, <strong>a self-described "conservative Texas Republican" and platoon sergeant who strongly advocates an American withdrawal. "Now, 95 percent of my platoon agrees with me."</strong></blockquote>]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Even poor representation is better than &quot;no representation&quot;</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://therealmccain.com/2007/05/even_poor_representation_is_be.php" />
   <id>tag:therealmccain.com,2007://26.6114</id>
   
   <published>2007-05-28T05:30:42Z</published>
   <updated>2007-06-07T20:21:14Z</updated>
   
   <summary> Pearce calls for McCain to resign By Daniel Scarpinato arizona daily star Tucson, Arizona | Published: 05.23.2007 PHOENIX — A Phoenix-area Republican legislator called on Sen. John McCain to resign from his seat Tuesday if he continues to miss...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Cliff Schecter</name>
      <uri>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/cliff-schecter/</uri>
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://therealmccain.com/">
      <![CDATA[<a href="http://bp1.blogger.com/_hQFy9C-miC4/RlWiDUcV-YI/AAAAAAAABG0/5rdUwOWVQc8/s1600-h/john+mccain.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_hQFy9C-miC4/RlWiDUcV-YI/AAAAAAAABG0/5rdUwOWVQc8/s200/john+mccain.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5068135133586258306" /></a>

<a href="http://www.azstarnet.com/sn/politics/184320">Pearce calls for McCain to resign </a>
By Daniel Scarpinato 
arizona daily star 
Tucson, Arizona | Published: 05.23.2007

PHOENIX — A Phoenix-area Republican legislator called on Sen. John McCain to resign from his seat Tuesday if he continues to miss votes while campaigning for president. 

]]>
      <![CDATA[State Rep. Russell Pearce of Mesa also said he regrets supporting Sen. Jon Kyl during last year's election because the senator now supports a comprehensive immigration bill — though he stopped short of calling for Kyl's resignation. 

"It's about time we start cleaning house if that's what it takes," said Pearce, chairman of the House Appropriations Committee. 

<strong>According to the Washington Post, McCain has missed 43 votes, nearly 50 percent of the current Congress' votes. In comparison, Hillary Clinton has missed less than 2 percent of votes and Barack Obama has missed 6.4 percent, according to the Post. </strong>

"We need a senator," Pearce said. "I think if McCain wants to be a full-time candidate and not be at the Senate, he ought to consider resigning." 

<strong>Asked if he would prefer a Napolitano appointee over McCain, Pearce said: "Even poor representation is better than <em>no representation</em>." </strong></blockquote> 

Wow, so this Republican legislator is saying he'd rather have a Democrat in Washington than McCain. Mr McCain, you may have a home base problem. Hint: Go visit your peeps some more. In fact, You may remember some guy named Bob Dole resigned his Senate seat to run for president--if you can't make it back to vote once in a while...well, it's just a thought.]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>McCain Pulls a Cheney</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://therealmccain.com/2007/05/mccain_pulls_a_cheney.php" />
   <id>tag:therealmccain.com,2007://26.6106</id>
   
   <published>2007-05-21T05:19:09Z</published>
   <updated>2007-05-21T05:20:55Z</updated>
   
   <summary>I guess those immigration negotiations get rather tense. Senator McCain and Senator &quot;Box-Turtle&quot; Cornyn apparently got into a dispute. Cornyn questioned McCain&apos;s commitment to the bill, in light of his recent proclivity for not showing up for votes....</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Cliff Schecter</name>
      <uri>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/cliff-schecter/</uri>
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://therealmccain.com/">
      <![CDATA[I guess those immigration negotiations get rather tense. Senator McCain and Senator "Box-Turtle" Cornyn apparently got into a dispute. Cornyn questioned McCain's commitment to the bill, in light of <a href="http://cliffschecter.blogspot.com/2007/05/you-would-think-if-youre-running-for.html">his recent proclivity for not showing up for votes</a>.

]]>
      <![CDATA[McCain responded with a verbal assault, <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/18/mccain-fbomb/">including an F-Bomb</a>. But hell, I guess that's better than the kind of ordinance he's been singing about dropping on Iran.

<em>For more on this and other stories go to <a href="http://cliffschecter.blogspot.com">cliffschecter.com</a></em>]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Probably A Bad Idea When Running For President</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://therealmccain.com/2007/05/probably_a_bad_idea_when_running_to_be_president.php" />
   <id>tag:therealmccain.com,2007://26.6105</id>
   
   <published>2007-05-21T05:12:26Z</published>
   <updated>2007-06-07T20:20:37Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) is the only presidential candidate in Congress to have missed a major vote on the Iraq war this year, and his absences are not sitting well with Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.)....</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Cliff Schecter</name>
      <uri>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/cliff-schecter/</uri>
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://therealmccain.com/">
      Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) is the only presidential candidate in Congress to have missed a major vote on the Iraq war this year, and his absences are not sitting well with Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.).
      <![CDATA[<blockquote><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2007/05/18/war-candidate-mccain-didn_n_48786.html">War Candidate McCain Didn't Show Up For Four Out Of 14 Latest Iraq Votes</a>
The Hill   |  Sam Youngman   |  Posted May 18, 2007 08:58 AM 

<a href="http://bp0.blogger.com/_hQFy9C-miC4/Rk21WEcV9pI/AAAAAAAABA8/GETirWLgJMA/s1600-h/mccainarmor.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;" src="http://bp0.blogger.com/_hQFy9C-miC4/Rk21WEcV9pI/AAAAAAAABA8/GETirWLgJMA/s400/mccainarmor.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5065904546616047250" /></a>

Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) is the only presidential candidate in Congress to have missed a major vote on the Iraq war this year, and his absences are not sitting well with Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.).

Liz Oxhorn, a spokeswoman for Reid, told The Hill, "Sen. McCain has spent considerable time defending the president on Iraq and catering to the Republican base on immigration, but has only managed to show up for four of the last 14 Iraq votes and parachute into [yesterday's] immigration press conference at the last minute. 

<strong>Right there are about 10 campaign commercials waiting to be made.</strong>

<em>For more on this and other stories go to <a href="http://cliffschecter.blogspot.com">cliffschecter.com</a></em>]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>General Batiste Calls Out John McCain For Covering George W. Bush</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://therealmccain.com/2007/05/general_batiste_calls_out_john_mccain_for_covering_george_w_bush.php" />
   <id>tag:therealmccain.com,2007://26.6099</id>
   
   <published>2007-05-15T19:22:41Z</published>
   <updated>2007-05-15T19:24:29Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Last week Maj. General John Batiste made headlines for saying that George W. Bush refused to listen to him and other Generals on the ground in Iraq. Now he is calling out John McCain for protecting Bush:...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Cliff Schecter</name>
      <uri>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/cliff-schecter/</uri>
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://therealmccain.com/">
      <![CDATA[Last week Maj. General John Batiste made headlines for saying that George W. Bush refused to listen to him and other Generals on the ground in Iraq.  Now he is <a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/jonathanmartin/">calling out John McCain</a> for protecting Bush:
]]>
      <![CDATA[<blockquote> As for McCain, the pro-Dem VoteVets group will air <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I8OGzHyo5dA">an ad</a> tonight featuring retired Maj Gen. John Batiste, the former commander of the First Infantry Division and a tough critic of the Iraq war.  "Senator McCain, protect America, not George Bush," says Batiste in the ad, to air on FOX after the debate.   It's one thing when liberal MoveOn.org attacks McCain on the war, but the Straight Talk folks could have a tougher time pushing back against a retired two-star.  </blockquote>

Cross-posted at <a href="http://cliffschecter.blogspot.com">Cliff Schecter</a>]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Will McCain Be Able</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://therealmccain.com/2007/05/will_mccain_be_able.php" />
   <id>tag:therealmccain.com,2007://26.6090</id>
   
   <published>2007-05-10T05:30:15Z</published>
   <updated>2007-05-10T05:32:30Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Note: This piece was first published in the San Francisco Chronicle As members of the GOP gathered for their first presidential debate this past Thursday, at what can only be described as the Mecca of Republican presidential politics, the Ronald...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Cliff Schecter</name>
      <uri>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/cliff-schecter/</uri>
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://therealmccain.com/">
      <![CDATA[<em><strong>Note: This piece was first published in the San Francisco Chronicle</em></strong>

As members of the GOP gathered for their first presidential debate this past Thursday, at what can only be described as the Mecca of Republican presidential politics, the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library, one member of the party-of-the-Gipper proved he still has his work cut out for him. That is, if he wishes to re-establish himself as the odds-on favorite to win the party nomination. 

]]>
      <![CDATA[Sen. John McCain of Arizona, a faithful Reagan Republican throughout the '80s, who repositioned himself as a moderate media darling for his 2000 presidential run, has since lost much of his allure. There are many reasons for this, but chief among them has been an awkward embrace of President Bush and equally awkward stroll -- with 100 of his closest friends in the infantry -- through a Baghdad bazaar. In the words of Hollywood legend Ricky Ricardo, McCain arrived at Simi Valley with "some splainin' to do." 

The problem is that McCain is attempting to win the hearts of suspicious conservatives while fortifying his fading appeal among more moderate Republicans and independent voters. Whether he accomplished either of these goals is open to debate, but I would argue he didn't, and largely because of mistakes he made before this colloquy took place. 

In recent months, it has become clear that McCain and his coterie of advisers made a series of miscalculations in 2001 and 2004. According to former Democratic Senate Leader Tom Daschle, after his bruising primary defeat at the hands of then-Gov. George W. Bush of Texas, McCain was the first Republican to approach the Democrats about switching his party affiliation. Of course, eventually it was Sen. Jim Jeffords of Vermont who crossed the aisle, becoming an independent and deciding to caucus with the Democrats. McCain stayed put in the GOP caucus. 

Once again, in 2004, after spending the intervening years as the proverbial thorn in President Bush's side, McCain thought of bolting the GOP. This time he approached Sen. John Kerry to discuss becoming his vice presidential running mate (not the other way around, as previously reported, according to Kerry himself). Again, McCain changed his mind, and in exchange for whatever promises made by Karl Rove for Campaign '08, suddenly moved hard to the right. McCain heartily endorsed President Bush and other Republican office-seekers, and attacked Democrats for good measure. 

For the onetime "maverick," these were fateful mistakes. Democrats, hungering for the ouster of President Bush, and increasingly falling in love with the GOP senator for his opposition to much of the president's agenda, would have readily supported a McCain presidential bid in 2004, if he had simply repeated his 1999 promise that he would not overturn Roe vs. Wade. After all, he had voted against President Bush's tax cuts, co-sponsored a strong Patient's Bill of Rights with Sen. Ted Kennedy and former Sen. John Edwards and had joined Kerry to propose vehicle-fuel standards, among a litany of other progressive positions. 

For all these reasons and more, conservatives will never forgive McCain, even with his 83 percent lifetime rating from the American Conservative Union and almost cultish support for a war gone very bad. And that's the problem. For it's the very voters that his support of the war and President Bush should appeal to who detest him most. 

Meanwhile, these positions have alienated many others who once admired him. This is a fact the candidate still did not seem to grasp Thursday evening, when he emphatically restated his support for more war in Mesopotamia and scarcely differentiated himself from a president with a lower approval rating than scurvy. 

The truth is that McCain's only hope for recapturing the widespread support he enjoyed in 2000 is to move toward more reality-based positions on the war in Iraq and the commander in chief. For that, he might want to go to the videotape and survey the wisdom of the '90s McCain, who called for benchmarks and troop pullouts in Somalia and Haiti, and famously said he didn't want to trade "American blood for Iraqi blood" during the Persian Gulf War. He might also want to read transcripts of the way he used to refer to The Decider, pre-2004. 

Becoming "the old McCain" again will help him win back the trust of a media scorned, which recently has come to regard him like any other cynical politician. 

Can McCain do this? Who knows. But what is clear is that he will not win over conservatives. 

Sen. McCain once said that "presidential ambition is a disease that can only be cured by embalming fluid." He was mostly right, but he might find an additional cure to be losing. 

<em><a href="http://cliffschecter.blogspot.com">Cliff Schecter </a>is the author "The Real McCain," to be published by PoliPoint Press in September</em>]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>McCain Leading in Iowa, New Hampshire and South Carolina</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://therealmccain.com/2007/05/mccain_leading_in_iowa_new_hampshire_and_south_carolina.php" />
   <id>tag:therealmccain.com,2007://26.6087</id>
   
   <published>2007-05-08T19:27:08Z</published>
   <updated>2007-05-08T19:38:59Z</updated>
   
   <summary>It has become popular to dismiss McCain because he has fallen behind Giuliani in national polls. But, at the risk of sounding like a broken record on this, McCain has the Bush Team that did him in in South Carolina...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Cliff Schecter</name>
      <uri>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/cliff-schecter/</uri>
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://therealmccain.com/">
      It has become popular to dismiss McCain because he has fallen behind Giuliani in national polls. But, at the risk of sounding like a broken record on this, McCain has the Bush Team that did him in in South Carolina in 2000 on his payroll. 
      <![CDATA[He knows if he wins the primaries and caucuses, those national polls will change quickly. Progressives dismiss his chances at their own peril, as this man <a href="http://news.bostonherald.com/politics/view.bg?articleid=197978">is still leading this thing</a> based on the aformentioned polls, and is still the most likely of the current crop of contenders to get the nomination. 

Keep that in mind my friends.

<em>For more on this and other stories, <a href="http://cliffschecter.blogspot.com">go to cliffschecter.com</a>.</em>]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>When this man is making fun of your candidacy...</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://therealmccain.com/2007/05/when_this_man_is_making_fun_of.php" />
   <id>tag:therealmccain.com,2007://26.6085</id>
   
   <published>2007-05-06T01:18:56Z</published>
   <updated>2007-05-14T01:20:08Z</updated>
   
   <summary>You&apos;ve probably got some campaign issues......</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Cliff Schecter</name>
      <uri>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/cliff-schecter/</uri>
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://therealmccain.com/">
      You&apos;ve probably got some campaign issues...
      <![CDATA[<object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/n8jj4px1wSA"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/n8jj4px1wSA" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>

<blockquote><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/story/0,,2073133,00.html">Saved by the bomb</a>

<strong>Senator McCain has hit upon a solution to all the Republican party's woes: a nuclear war with Iran </strong>

Terry Jones
Saturday May 5, 2007
The Guardian 

Campaigning in Oklahoma the other day, the Republican senator John McCain was asked what should be done about Iran. He responded by singing, "Bomb bomb bomb bomb bomb Iran", to the tune of the Beach Boys' Barbara Ann. (Join the hilarity and see for yourself on YouTube.)

 How can any thinking person disagree? I mean, any country with a president who doesn't shave properly and never wears a tie deserves what's coming to it - a lot of American bombs, with a few British ones thrown in to ensure we don't miss out on the ensuing upsurge in terrorism.

(snip)

In 1955 Albert Einstein and Bertrand Russell said the world was faced by a "stark and dreadful and inescapable" choice: "Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?" 

Senator McCain wasn't bothered by such questions; the human race may be standing on a precipice, but the Republicans have a chance of permanent re-election.</blockquote>

Cross-posted at <a href="http://cliffschecter.com">cliffschecter.com</a>.]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>I Feel Safer Already</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://therealmccain.com/2007/05/i_feel_safer_already.php" />
   <id>tag:therealmccain.com,2007://26.6082</id>
   
   <published>2007-05-05T17:41:30Z</published>
   <updated>2007-05-05T17:48:00Z</updated>
   
   <summary>McCain: I&apos;ll Follow Bin Laden &quot;To The Gates Of Hell&quot; Romney: Bin Laden Is Going To Pay And &quot;He Will Die&quot; Hmmm...Where have I seen this before, um...That&apos;s right: &quot;Wanted Dead Or Alive.&quot;...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Cliff Schecter</name>
      <uri>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/cliff-schecter/</uri>
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://therealmccain.com/">
      McCain: I&apos;ll Follow Bin Laden &quot;To The Gates Of Hell&quot;

Romney: Bin Laden Is Going To Pay And &quot;He Will Die&quot;


Hmmm...Where have I seen this before, um...That&apos;s right:

&quot;Wanted Dead Or Alive.&quot;
      
Here&apos;s the not so funny thing. He&apos;s alive. And we don&apos;t have him. 

So please Mr. McCain and Mr. Romney, enough with the John Wayne talk, while the head of your party you&apos;re so hesitant to criticize by name continues his six-year record of failing to catch the man who pulled off the single most deadly terrorist attack against the United States in our history.
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>More On McCain&apos;s &quot;Conversion&quot; On Foreign Policy</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://therealmccain.com/2007/04/more_on_mccains_conversion_on_foreign_policy.php" />
   <id>tag:therealmccain.com,2007://26.6075</id>
   
   <published>2007-04-28T18:29:50Z</published>
   <updated>2007-04-28T18:43:23Z</updated>
   
   <summary>It really is sad to see a guy who once was deemed the &quot;straight-talker&quot; so exposed in this way. I wish he would come out and explain his foreign policy conversion, sans cliche (9/11 changed everything, etc.). Judge for yourself:...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Cliff Schecter</name>
      <uri>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/cliff-schecter/</uri>
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://therealmccain.com/">
      It really is sad to see a guy who once was deemed the &quot;straight-talker&quot; so exposed in this way. I wish he would come out and explain his foreign policy conversion, sans cliche (9/11 changed everything, etc.).

Judge for yourself:



      <![CDATA[<object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/palbo-ilalU"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/palbo-ilalU" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>
<strong>
AND</strong>

<object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/o8TFKXHiefs"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/o8TFKXHiefs" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>

This kind of transformation in your thinking obviously needs a bit of an explanation. Unless you're trying to win the prestigious <em>Brittany Spears Clarity Of Thought</em> award.

Furthermore, you can't go charging people with emboldening the enemy on Iraq, unless you want to say you were doing that very thing for two decades.

What happened to ya John? Do tell.
]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Stewart and McCain Reunited...and it doesn&apos;t feel too good</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://therealmccain.com/2007/04/stewart_and_mccain_reunitedand.php" />
   <id>tag:therealmccain.com,2007://26.6067</id>
   
   <published>2007-04-25T19:37:34Z</published>
   <updated>2007-04-25T19:42:47Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Check out Crooks and Liars&apos; video of McCain&apos;s recent trip to the Daily Show. Here&apos;s an excerpt: Stewart tries to explain a few things to St. McCain about fighting a civil war: &quot;…but that assumes that we&apos;re fighting one enemy—they&apos;re...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Ali Latifi</name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://therealmccain.com/">
      <![CDATA[Check out <a href="http://www.crooksandliars.com">Crooks and Liars'</a href> video of McCain's recent trip to the Daily Show. Here's an excerpt:

<a href="http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/04/25/senator-mccain-on-the-daily-show/">Stewart tries to explain a few things to St. McCain about fighting a civil war:

    "…but that assumes that we're fighting one enemy—they're fighting each other. We're not surrendering to an enemy that has defeated us. We're saying, how do you quell a civil war when it's not your country?" </a href>

McCain got very angry that Stewart called them out for using the " you're not supporting the troops," theme and was trying to filibuster the segment…He tried to use the troops as a wedge. Stewart got hot and fought back…McCain started to stutter. (rough transcript)

    ]]>
      <![CDATA[Check out <a href="http://www.crooksandliars.com">Crooks and Liars'</a href> video of McCain's recent trip to the Daily Show. Here's an excerpt:

<a href="http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/04/25/senator-mccain-on-the-daily-show/">Stewart tries to explain a few things to St. McCain about fighting a civil war:

    "…but that assumes that we're fighting one enemy—they're fighting each other. We're not surrendering to an enemy that has defeated us. We're saying, how do you quell a civil war when it's not your country?" </a href>

McCain got very angry that Stewart called them out for using the " you're not supporting the troops," theme and was trying to filibuster the segment…He tried to use the troops as a wedge. Stewart got hot and fought back…McCain started to stutter. (rough transcript)

    Stewart: All I'm saying is you cannot look a soldier in the eye and say questioning the president is less supportive to you than extending your tour for three months when you should be coming home to your family.

    McCain: Every American..

    Stewart: And that's not fair to put on people that criticize…

    McCain: Jon…

    Stewart: And you know I love you and respect your service and would never question any of that—this is not about questioning the troops and their ability to fight and their ability to be supported. And that is what the administration does and that is almost criminal.
]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>McCain&apos;s incendiary Iran comments</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://therealmccain.com/2007/04/mccains_incendiary_iran_commen.php" />
   <id>tag:therealmccain.com,2007://26.6058</id>
   
   <published>2007-04-20T19:03:38Z</published>
   <updated>2007-04-20T23:43:28Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Watch as John McCain manages to offend all the people of Iran, the Beach Boys, and almost everyone else in twenty seconds....</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Ali Latifi</name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://therealmccain.com/">
      Watch as John McCain manages to offend all the people of Iran, the Beach Boys, and almost everyone else in twenty seconds.
      <![CDATA[<object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/C9L3kEQXjrU"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/C9L3kEQXjrU" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>McCain The Imus Enabler</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://therealmccain.com/2007/04/mccain_the_imus_enabler.php" />
   <id>tag:therealmccain.com,2007://26.6055</id>
   
   <published>2007-04-19T12:55:41Z</published>
   <updated>2007-04-19T13:15:57Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Max Blumenthal has a great piece on Imus&apos; number one fan. Yeah, you guessed it. Senator John McCain....</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Cliff Schecter</name>
      <uri>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/cliff-schecter/</uri>
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://therealmccain.com/">
      Max Blumenthal has a great piece on Imus&apos; number one fan. Yeah, you guessed it. Senator John McCain.
      <![CDATA[<a href="http://www.thenation.com/blogs/campaignmatters?bid=45&pid=187789">To quote Max</a>:

<blockquote>Last week, as public pressure for the resignation of Imus increased in the wake of his characterization of Rutgers University's women's basketball team "nappy headed ho's," the I-Man received a much-needed boost from an old friend. 

"He has apologized," Sen. John McCain ☼ said of Imus. "He said that he is deeply sorry. I'm a great believer in redemption."</blockquote>

But as often seems to be the case, <a href="http://www.thenation.com/blogs/campaignmatters?bid=45&pid=187789">McCain had an ulterior motive</a>:

<blockquote>For decades, Washington's political class has relied on Imus and his massive audience of politically independent white males for notoriety and book sales. McCain is no exception. He has been one of the most frequent and favorite of Imus' guests since his maverick 2000 presidential run earned him national name recognition. Imus' impending departure from the national airwaves threatened to deprive McCain of a key platform going into the '08 primaries. McCain was determined to protect that platform, whether or not it simultaneously served as a constant launching pad for the crudest of racial slurs.</blockquote> 

Max goes on to name other enablers of this rather unfunny, <a href="http://cliffschecter.blogspot.com/2007/04/what-joe-said.html">racially insensitive if not outright racist man</a>, but the crux of it is that McCain was Imus' number one guy. And visa versa. 

How surprising.

<em>For more on this and other stories, go to <a href="http://cliffschecter.com">cliffschecter.com</a>.</em>
]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Senator Webb Slams McCain&apos;s Hypocrisy</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://therealmccain.com/2007/04/senator_webb_slams_mccains_hyp.php" />
   <id>tag:therealmccain.com,2007://26.6052</id>
   
   <published>2007-04-15T20:05:13Z</published>
   <updated>2007-04-15T20:14:55Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Former Secretary of the Navy and decorated Marine veteran Jim Webb is not happy that John McCain pulled him aside on the Senate floor and said he did not want to see one side impugning the other&apos;s patriotism, when McCain...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Cliff Schecter</name>
      <uri>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/cliff-schecter/</uri>
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://therealmccain.com/">
      <![CDATA[Former Secretary of the Navy and decorated Marine veteran Jim Webb <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2007/04/14/webb-mccain/">is not happy</a> that John McCain pulled him aside on the Senate floor and said he did not want to see one side impugning the other's patriotism, when McCain turned around and did just that:]]>
      <![CDATA[<blockquote>I’m disappointed in John McCain. I’ve known him for many years. The day before we begin the debate on the Iraq bills, he pulled me aside on the Senate floor and said, Jim, we do not want the situation we had in the Vietnam War. We do not want one side impugning the patriotism of the other side, and John McCain has been doing this consistently since that time. I don’t believe that it is in anybody’s interest for members of the Senate to be impugning the other side’s patriotism, or by the way, to be hiding behind the troops as political justification for what we’re doing.</blockquote>]]>
   </content>
</entry>

</feed>

